• huppakee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Not to be that guy, but it’s actually Companies pay the running cost of YouTube (plus a little bit of pocket money for the creators whose videos you watch) so you can watch free of charge, in exchange for this they get to show you a video. I don’t like Google either and rob them of their income by using an adblocker. Though if nobody pays and nobody watches ads they might find even worse ways to pay the bills.

    • Vespair@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Google wants to get paid thrice for YouTube. That’s not okay.

      I’ll consider allowing ads when they stop harvesting and selling data - until then, that data is my payment.

      They don’t get to show ads, sell our data, and charge a subscription. I’m tired of paying twice for shit.

      • huppakee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah Google sucks, didn’t want to defend them but the business model in general. Companies should not be allowed to sell data. Them collecting your data as part of their ad business is one thing, but selling it shouldn’t be allowed imo.

        • Vespair@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          This. If you want to collect analytics for in house decision making, merchandising, whatever, I say go for. But as soon as you start selling that data or the conclusions thereof, it becomes a currency, and if I’m paying that currency you better not be asking me for another.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Well, yeah. Companies pay youtube to show you ads on their platform; this lets youtube stay free for users while still being an unbelievably expensive operation (not debating the ethics just - that’s how the funding works). As an alternative, youtube gives you the option of paying them directly to buy the space ads would normally have bid on, and then blank it out. They get a steady monthly revenue stream, even if it’s less than they’d be making by selling that ad space, and you get no ads.

    • macniel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I rather pay for good entertainment than watch ads for bad entertainment.

    • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      What like… Charge influencers to upload their shit videos? Oh sweet baby Jesus, that would be amazing!