• pmk@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    If I remember right sweden lost a tiny colony because the guy who ran it just sold it without being authorized to do so and ran off with the money.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        oh yeah absolutely, we did trade slaves even though it was illegal here. classic “playing both sides” stuff.

        • Rothe@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          That is pretty much how it worked in most European countries at the time. During or in the late middle ages, slavery was outlawed in a lot of European countries. But none of that legislation applied to the colonies during the early modern period.

          So a lot of European countries had to abolish slavery twice (or more).

  • Griffus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Söta bror doing söt colonialism

    Yet, they still own the Norwegian regions of Jemtland and Herjedalen, so while colonialism and Wasa was their biggest failures, they got something from it.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      not every war is colonialism. I can see going to war (and as a californian, the irony is not at all lost on me) over the Sound Dues

    • kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      those regions havent been norwegian for almost 400 years, maybe it’s time to let go buddy