The company is said to be taking great care to address the privacy concerns that Meta has faced with its own wearables.
  • FireWire400@lemmy.worldEnglish
    12·
    il y a 4 heures

    As far as I’m concerned the best way of making smart glasses with a focus on privacy is to not make them at all. Or at least don’t stick a camera on it.

    • dev_null@lemmy.mlEnglish
      1·
      il y a 30 minutes

      I like the concept of having a display in your glasses. I just don’t fathom why would you also put a camera on them.

      • benjirenji@slrpnk.netEnglish
        1·
        il y a 13 minutes

        If you want to align virtual content with the real world in any way you need a camera attached. Sure, you can use the display for notifications and content that doesn’t care where you’re facing, but having a display attached to your face is a too juicy scenario not to do more with it.

  • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    1·
    il y a 2 heures

    Well, it doesn’t take a genius to assume the existence of the Vision Pro suggests work on the Vision Non-Pro had begun.

    Too bad the current iteration will never see the light of day, for obvious reasons

  • Miller@lemmy.worldEnglish
    15·
    il y a 6 heures

    Did they mention if they were focusing on preserving or destroying privacy?

    • chaosCruiser@futurology.todayEnglish
      9·
      il y a 7 heures

      If you glue an iPod nano on a pair of old sunglasses, you could technically call them privacy respecting smart glasses. Obvious, that’s not what they’re actually going to do though.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.orgEnglish
    18·
    il y a 6 heures

    It’s all about redefining terms.

    “You give your data to us. All of them, of course. Because, what else. When we have all your data, then we are able to protect your data better than you are. This is called data privacy”

    • axh@lemmy.worldEnglish
      5·
      il y a 5 heures

      we are able to protect your data better than you are.

      Definitely, because they have rules and procedures on how to protect your data, and a price that their trusted partners must pay to get it.

      And you? you are so fucking irresponsible with your data, that you gave it to a huge corporation! For free!

      That alone is enough to discredit your ability to protect your data!

  • WanderingThoughts@europe.pubEnglish
    1·
    il y a 4 heures

    If it automatically blurs out the face and body of everybody unless they explicitly gave permission to be recorded by that user through an app or site, and on a base level before the feed goes to any app, then you can have some semblance of privacy.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.worldEnglish
    22·
    il y a 4 heures

    First apple tag, now this. Apple must really love the creepy stalkers they cater to.