• Kittywifclaws@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s not even the pay. Every child deserves the education to be tailored to them but there aren’t enough people to sit down one on one with every kid. No budget meant no kid ever got one on one unless they had a disability and the school got money for another person. It always came down to not enough bodies. The pay was just insult to injury.

    • CobblerScholar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      That’s my point, if the job paid well then more and more educated people would want to do the job to begin with so teachers didnt feel the need to have a tablet do teaching because they don’t have the time

    • protist@retrofed.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      One on one isn’t even necessary, look at the Montessori curriculum, two competent Montessori guides can manage a classroom of 30 kids with each kid working at their own pace (within guardrails, of course). The structure of public education in the US is a problem in addition to chronic underfunding

      • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Montessori style education works very well for certain learning types, but often under-supports others and can suffer from poor implementation just like any other educational model. One-on-one is far superior for some students, and that will never not be the case.

      • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Thinking back to my school days 15 students in a class was okay. I think I’d prefer that instead of 30 students and two teachers.