• ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The man was in duress and being forced to hand over his PIN while being denied access to legal counsel, that is the very reason for a duress PIN. I don’t think the charge is even going to make it to real court, his defense has a great case for it to be thrown out.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The fact that he’s in the news is a VERY good sign. In a real 3rd world shithole he would just disappear because he pissed off an unaccountable field goon.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        (That’s why arrest data is required to be public, despite the damage it does to the arrestee’s reputation, BTW.)

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          It’s a tough balance, it puts cops in a position to destroy someone’s life with zero proof of any law being broken - like Paul Reubens…

    • notabot@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Whilst, yes, he probably did feel under duress, he had a choice to make; hand over the phone, or wipe it and face the repercussions from doing so. Bear in mind, that from the agent’s point of view, they had the lawful right to search his phone, so arguing duress will be tricky at best. In his position, I’d like to think I was comfortable handing over the phone because I’d wiped it before travelling.

      Having said all that, yes, I agree that his defense has some strong arguments. However, if they decide to make an exame of him, those arguments wont do him much good.