• Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    To be fair, when I took Economics 101: Macroeconomics in 1985, there was a big point about how important it was to maintain a fairly even wealth distribution, with a discussion of how it is a very bad thing™ for all the wealth to consolidate at the top. (In the meantime, Reagan was gutting all the policies that were used to keep wealth distributed and preserve a strong middle class.) So this is something that anyone who took a basic college course should know.

    In time, I got confused that presidents and legislators kept pushing supply side (trickle-down) economics and kept passing laws that allowed the upper class to keep more of their money, while leaving the lower and middle classes to languish, when I was certain these officials were educated (or had experts who were) and should know better. Then I worked out that they are just captured and corrupt AF.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      This and anti-cyclical spending avoiding depressions are the only two real¹ predictions from the guy that basically invented macroeconomics.

      No politician cares about either of them.

      1 - Meaning about things people actually need, not money.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        which dude who invented marco? because we have like three real schools of marco and then the austrians sitting around with they thumbs up they butts

        because they scared of numbers

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Money (power) corrupts and people with lots of money rarely want to part with it. Also, money protects money, so the rich often deal in the shadows to protect themselves from us.