• village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Fahrenheit is better than Celsius for weather. It’s a larger scale that doesn’t have to involve decimals.

      Celsius is how the temperature feels to water, whereas Fahrenheit is more of how the temperature feels to a human.

      But this is basically only true for the temperature ranges seen in weather.

      • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Fahrenheit is how the scale between the temperature of a specific brine solution to the estimated temperature on a specific women with a fever “feels”. It is not based on humans in any way. That is only what Americans like to push because they have only ever known Fahrenheit.

        To me Celsius is how the temperature feels to a human. Because that is what I’ve grown up with.

        How humans perceive things like temperature also widely ranges. What for some is too hot, for other is too cold. Had Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit grown up in a different climate, your entire temperature scale would be different.

        Human senses is thus a dumb way to base any scale on. Better to use something static … like water. One of the most abundant things on our planet.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because it provides zero practical benefit for the vast majority of people.

      There’s no reason to other than to be the same as everyone else, and we already are for anything scientific or medical.

    • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because retooling is expensive. I applaud the adaptation, but we have a lot of tools written that way. Also, are patents written in English or metric units? Would that invalidate them?

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Because retooling is expensive.

        Other countries have done it successfully.

        Is the USA incapable of doing things that others have done?

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Parents are written in customary primarily, but the patent office recommends listing units in both for global clarity.

        It wouldn’t invalidate them because customary is defined by metric, so there’s no ambiguity. It’s exactly the same as saying “the bar is 1 meter long” vs “the bar is 100 centimeter long”. An inch is just a quaint way to write 25.4 mm.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      the same reason they don’t speak french.

      you can use metric, just like you can speak french.

      but people will think you’re talking gibberish.