What an absolutely fucked up mentality. Poor people deserve luxuries as well. Life shouldn’t be only about survival, that’s not healthy for one’s mental well-being. You’re fucked in the head, mate.
I’m not sure if you replied to the correct post mate because nothing you said has been said by me lmao.
Poor people deserve luxuries as well
Idk where I have ever said they don’t. But you don’t get to buy something for a set price that is clearly communicated before and then demand a refund when you find out it’s actually cheaper lmao. That’s the dumbest take ever and the fact you would sue for it is beyond me.
If the device was locked behind a 50€/month subscription or something that wasn’t communicated clearly before, hey, go sue. Absolutely appropriate. But buying something and then sueing later because you want money back for no other reason than: “WELL THEY GET MONEY BACK!” is karen behavior.
Quit carrying water for soulless companies.
I think that’s the cringest thing you can say. I’m not whiteknighting for nintendo, the company can go fuck themselves up the ass for all I care. However, the diffrence between you and me is that I’m looking at this situation from a neutral point of view while you are already biased before you even read anything about it.
Imagine a small retailer selling something for X€ to a large company, then wins back some tariff money and then gets sued by that large company for damages. Would you also consider that fine? Because I’m pretty sure your moral compass would shift immediately in that situation.
If you buy something that you don’t need to survive, you are apparently fine with the price.
If you are, you should not ask for a partial refund.
If you aren’t, why are you buying it in the first place?
What an absolutely fucked up mentality. Poor people deserve luxuries as well. Life shouldn’t be only about survival, that’s not healthy for one’s mental well-being. You’re fucked in the head, mate.
Quit carrying water for soulless companies.
I’m not sure if you replied to the correct post mate because nothing you said has been said by me lmao.
Idk where I have ever said they don’t. But you don’t get to buy something for a set price that is clearly communicated before and then demand a refund when you find out it’s actually cheaper lmao. That’s the dumbest take ever and the fact you would sue for it is beyond me.
If the device was locked behind a 50€/month subscription or something that wasn’t communicated clearly before, hey, go sue. Absolutely appropriate. But buying something and then sueing later because you want money back for no other reason than: “WELL THEY GET MONEY BACK!” is karen behavior.
I think that’s the cringest thing you can say. I’m not whiteknighting for nintendo, the company can go fuck themselves up the ass for all I care. However, the diffrence between you and me is that I’m looking at this situation from a neutral point of view while you are already biased before you even read anything about it.
Imagine a small retailer selling something for X€ to a large company, then wins back some tariff money and then gets sued by that large company for damages. Would you also consider that fine? Because I’m pretty sure your moral compass would shift immediately in that situation.