not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoso much winninglemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1148arrow-down14
arrow-up1144arrow-down1imageso much winninglemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down2·edit-223 hours agoThis graph is about 10 years old. The peso is pretty stable. Only lost like halve it’s value in the recent 3 years.
minus-squareBlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·21 hours agoThe graph is still approaching zero, it’s only stable because it’s so close already
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·20 hours agoIt is not jumpy. It being close to zero can be fixed on your end by choosing proper y scale. A sudden change in value is different to a trend.
minus-squarenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-214 hours agoit went from .0008 to .0006 which is 25% down, its a logarithmic graph, if it keeps losing at a steady rate , you cant just zoom out and say it looks steady because of that
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·14 hours agoThat’s much less loss of value than 10 years ago. I didn’t say that.
This graph is about 10 years old. The peso is pretty stable.
Only lost like halve it’s value in the recent 3 years.
The graph is still approaching zero, it’s only stable because it’s so close already
It is not jumpy. It being close to zero can be fixed on your end by choosing proper y scale.
A sudden change in value is different to a trend.
it went from .0008 to .0006 which is 25% down, its a logarithmic graph, if it keeps losing at a steady rate , you cant just zoom out and say it looks steady because of that
That’s much less loss of value than 10 years ago. I didn’t say that.