not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoso much winninglemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1148arrow-down14
arrow-up1144arrow-down1imageso much winninglemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·20 hours agoIt is not jumpy. It being close to zero can be fixed on your end by choosing proper y scale. A sudden change in value is different to a trend.
minus-squarenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-214 hours agoit went from .0008 to .0006 which is 25% down, its a logarithmic graph, if it keeps losing at a steady rate , you cant just zoom out and say it looks steady because of that
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·14 hours agoThat’s much less loss of value than 10 years ago. I didn’t say that.
It is not jumpy. It being close to zero can be fixed on your end by choosing proper y scale.
A sudden change in value is different to a trend.
it went from .0008 to .0006 which is 25% down, its a logarithmic graph, if it keeps losing at a steady rate , you cant just zoom out and say it looks steady because of that
That’s much less loss of value than 10 years ago. I didn’t say that.