• KairuByte@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Oh really? I honestly never considered that possibility and always thought of concrete as a kind of inert “stone,” I find this legitimately interesting.

    • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      14 hours ago

      My understanding is that the genius of such attacks is they don’t actually have to do the damage but if there’s the fear of chemical damage you don’t want to build the rest of a building on top of it.

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        This right here is the answer. The possibility that the concrete cure was all or partially disrupted can mean the concrete has to go away and be re-poured.