• MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    You write well. Also, is it illegal to possess a naked picture of oneself as a child?

    I guess it’s about the risk of someone viewing it sexually.

    • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      No, naked photographs of children are not illegal in that context

      Heard of a guy with pictures of his kid in the bath. Police investigated and once they realised it was his own kid, no further action.

      Might vary based on where you live of course.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        on the flip side, theres the story of the man who, during the height of covid, had his child develop a bad rash in their diaper area

        Doctors requested photos for diagnosis.

        Google detected the photo, and called the police on him, calling him a child predator and CSAM producer.

        Police said it was a innocent, medically necessary photo.

        Doctor said it was an innocent, medically necessary photo.

        Google said, no, fuck you, we don’t care what the authorities say, you are a child fucking pervert, and we can prove it, and then pointing to a video from 6 months earlier of the mother laying on bed, i think after a bath/shower, unclothed…with the baby on her chest.A completely harmless, beautiful mother/child moment… but google perved out on it so hard they said he and his wife were the pedophiles.

        and proceeded to delete his phone number, emails, photos, and everything else he had tied to google.

        • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          So it wasn’t illegal. Along with a holy fucking shit load of reasons to never touch google products.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            I really hope he eventually sues, wins, and gets capital B billions. Cause anything less they wont even feel, and Cause they caused him incredible harm, both with the baseless accusations, their inability to back down, and by deleting a decade+ of emails, pictures, contacts, etc etc without warning or an ability to retrieve them.

            • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I’m skeptical he would win that suit. Google can just say that they had to enforce their rules regardless of whether the police think he’s innocent or not, and since they own the servers that his files were on, they reserve the right to delete those files if they decide to.

      • MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Correct me if I’m wrong but the key to any good long text/speech is having as many interesting visual descriptions as possible. Emphasis on interesting.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          See? Imagery. And also, buy a bottle of bourbon and a bottle of rye with the excuse of doing A-B comparisons of Old Fashioned cocktails, drink like 6 and come away with the opinion that your favorite between the two is Luxardo cherries.