• FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    I still do not understand why they don’t use heat exchange loops, like we figured out for nukes 75 years ago

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because it’s considerably cheaper to do it this way and they’re being allowed to do so. Why would they spend money building giant cooling towers when they can just dump the hot water into the river and then drain main supply for fresh supply.

    • binux@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s as the case is with everything for these parasites: if it loses them too much money or makes them too little, they avoid it like the plague. It’s cheaper upfront to just run it through an open system.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      They usually do. They just do the same thing a lot of nuclear reactors do and also evaporatively cool one end of the heat exchange loop.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        As far as I can see they don’t ever do it that way, that’s the problem, if it was a closed loop they wouldn’t be pulling water from the mains and causing water pressure issues for everybody else.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          They cool the hot side of the loop with running water, like reactors do, rather than using air.

          So the loop is closed, but they’re using running water to cool it off faster, rather than needing a bigger radiator on the hot side.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            That’s not what they’re doing though. That would be fine that’s just a heat exchanger.

            What they are doing is pulling water from the mains to cool the system either directly or to cool an internal system via heat exchanger and then are dumping hot water back into the environment. They’re not pumping the water to cooling ponds and letting it cool back down and then pulling the water back out of the cooling ponds to use again.

            • T156@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              I was thinking more along the lines of the big evaporative cooling towers you see with a lot of reactors, since they rely on vaporisation to cool off, most of that water can’t be reused, short of getting picked up in the water cycle again.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Unfortunately not. Computing hardware doesn’t get that hot.

          The chips would be fried if you had them at the temperatures where they were generating enough steam to run a turbine.