• edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Oh no 13 out of 257 members of the big tent party… And we still got a bunch in the primaries. Give your balls a tug.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      20% of the democratic party is progressive. Whats your big plan to win any election ever again without them? I would have thought losing the last election would teach you chuckleheads some simple math but here we go again.

      How many more DNC cashouts/betrayals can the country handle before either the government collapses or we descend completely into fascism? Why arent the centrists dems DOING THEIR EFFING JOB never a possible discussion topic for people like you? God forbid we have a concrete party platform and have any expectation that anyone follow it, right? That might mean fewer donations from special interests and foreign nations.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        They genuinely would prefer to lose to a republican than let a socialist win, because a republican isn’t going to fuck up the bag for them.

        • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          None of you dumbfucks can read. What part of “elect progressives in democratic primaries to turn the democratic party into a progressive socialist party” do you not understand? This is literally the only point I’ve been making here, if all you stupid numpty motherfuckers voted for progressives in democratic primaries we’d have a fucking progressive party. But you dumb shits can’t even fucking read.