• Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Surely in 2030 or something we’ll get a phone that’s all camera bump.

      Aren’t these new phones actually thicker than the iPhone 4s? Despite apple taking the thickness at its “” thinnest “” point (which can only actually be 0)

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        The iPhone 6 was the thinnest iPhone. They’ve been getting thicker ever since. Including or not including bump.

        The base of the iPhone 17 pro is thinner than the 4 (8.75 vs 9.3mm) but the bump takes it up to 13mm.

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          So the phone is 13mm thick.

          If we’re talking the thinnest point, the thickness is 0.

          • ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            You’re ignoring the only reason that thickness is communicated at all, which is practicality, portability, pocketability etc.

      • DrakeAlbrecht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Someone probably said “Would you kindly zip up all of your testing photos and videos and upload them to this Dropbox?” to the AI customer service agent.