The lawsuit is small in scale so far, but if the court accepts the plaintiffs’ claims and formally approves it as a class action, it could expand. Bathaee Dunne, the antitrust law firm representing the plaintiffs, is aiming for a class action representing all general consumers and businesses that purchased products containing D-RAM. The firm previously won a case alleging collusion in Google’s digital advertising. If the plaintiffs ultimately prevail in the class action, the defendant companies would have to pay triple the damages.

The fact that Samsung Electronics and SK hynix have previously been found guilty of collusion in the United States is also a concern. Both companies were found to have engaged in price fixing in the US in the early 2000s, resulting in large fines as well as prison sentences for executives. However, industry players including investment bank Jefferies forecast that the lawsuit will not affect memory prices at least until the end of this year.