Arch is only for mid-level PCs.

  • RustyNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    What’s your argument for that?

    I use nixos btw… Which isn’t better when hydra has been down for a whole week now

    • CarlLandry357@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think Arch’s forced OS updates and want you to run the latest(heavy?) softwares, similar to Windows.

      • devfuuu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        You can just not update for weeks or months if that’s your thing. If there’s a thing arch doesn’t do is force things.

      • Ooops@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        (heavy?)

        And right there lies your misconception. Newer software is not heavier by definition. Quite the contrary it often gets more efficient because of constant optimisation and improvements.

        The concept of newer software using up ressouces like crazy is the scam used by corporate OS’ so you buy new hardware constantly.

      • lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        What the actual heck are you talking about lol. Arch is quite minimal out of the box. Of course it’s your system, you can install whatever you want

      • RustyNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ok this is indeed solved by nix.

        Not the bloat mind you. Nixos is the king of redundancy bloat (unless you use Btrfs and something like bees)