• hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    It’s called pedantry, and I have never failed to own it. At this point, I feel like you’re trying to be overly abrasive.

    Was it not your interpretation that the messages seem to not be from LLMs, because they’re identical? Because that’s literally what you said.

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Fair enough. Still, why would you misrepresent my view so radically unless you were being uncharitable on purpose?

        • timochka@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Because being pedantic just to try and make yourself feel superior to someone who was posting in good faith is obnoxious behaviour that deserves to be called out. You knew exactly what they meant, but thought you’d truth-bomb your way in for what, exactly? You did nothing to actually address their point - that the messages being identical is prima facie evidence that (original AI generated or not) it was probably candidates copy-and-pasting a standard form response, which could (and was) be done long before LLMs were a thing - and instead just added “look how clever I am”.

          Dick behaviour doesn’t deserve a charitable response.

          • hperrin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            People confuse LLMs for being non-deterministic all the time. The comment implied that. I want people to understand that LLMs are deterministic, because I don’t want people confusing them with actual intelligence or some sort of “black magic”. But sure man, whatever excuse you need to be an asshole to a stranger.