• Bizzle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    My understanding is that flatpaks run in a sandbox, so although there is a risk- especially for what you give permissions to- it’s not exactly the same. The AUR is basically “curl | bash”, it’s a miracle this hasn’t happened before. If you’re worried about it I think flatseal can look at the permissions and such, but you’re probably fine.

          • SteveTech@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Well, both the Flathub website and KDE Discover list this, so this seems like a GNOME issue and not a Flatpak issue.

            Flathub:

            Screenshot of Evolution on Flathub

            KDE Discover:

            Screenshot of Evolution on KDE Discover

            • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              FlatHub website

              Where? I don’t see it here. Can click on the “manifest” but nobody will be reading all of that. Tried Tor Browser to rule out extensions. Maybe it’s actually communicating with the desktop client in some way which I don’t have?

              Also, a backdoor in this particular program can steal your PGP keys. Some clueless guy who added it to GitHub for a tutorial may have some issues if it’s not password protected. It’s in no way like Android where “OpenKeychain” were forced to define a protocol and now reading a key prompts the user.

              Oh, and one of the few dozen local privilege escalations found by AI in the mountains of trash of our great kernel completely negate all of this. It has to be AI because no human nowadays is doing all of that anymore. And enslaving humans to pick out code 24/7 isn’t legal anymore anywhere, ya know.

              • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                FlatHub website

                Where? I don’t see it here.

                click the red “medium risk” thing near the install button

                Oh, and one of the few dozen local privilege escalations found by AI in the mountains of trash of our great kernel completely negate all of this. It has to be AI because no human nowadays is doing all of that anymore. And enslaving humans to pick out code 24/7 isn’t legal anymore anywhere, ya know.

                that’s not a problem of flathub, but literally all computers. windows, macos, android is also susceptible to it.

                • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  click the red “medium risk”

                  Literally how the fuck was I, or let alone “a simple user”, is supposed to know that? “Intuitive, uncluttered UI” my ass. Also “The software developer has verified their identity, which makes the app more likely to be safe” ??? How Android wannabe (without actually being anything like Android) do they want to be???

                  not a problem of flathub

                  The problem of flathub is the illusion of safety.

                  • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    55 minutes ago

                    click the red “medium risk”

                    Literally how the fuck was I, or let alone “a simple user”, is supposed to know that?

                    idk, this is the first time I saw that menu. it’s a pretty visible red at a prominent place on the webpage, so I wouldn’t say it’s hidden

                    The problem of flathub is the illusion of safety.

                    where is the illusion of the safety? where does it say it’s the safest thing ever made?

      • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Just check the permissions of an app before installing. Bazaar has a gauge for how “safe” an app is based on permissions. If it doesn’t request internet, filesystem access, and other powerful permissions, it’ll be marked as the safest.

        Really it’s the same as docker. It’s secure most of the time, but don’t come crying about getting hacked if you give all your containers access to /dev, host networking, etc

      • Billegh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Pretty much. Snap is the only one with a semblance of anything appearing to be security, and nearly every container requires you to turn it off to run.

      • Bizzle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Ha! That sucks. I appreciate that article but now I’m having a little bit of an existential crisis.

    • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      24 hours ago

      While they are sandboxed, there is still potential for them to cause harm. Its in theory a safer system, but nothing is full proof. I’d agree that its likely fine but best to be cautious

      • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The problem is trust. Sandboxing is all well and good, but what of the data I give the app directly and the resources it has access to?
        If a person installs the Steam client from FlatHub and logs in to it with their account credentials, how will they know the app wasn’t actually published by a third party who modified it to act as a man in the middle to steal account credentials. They’d need to be vigilant and follow a flathub link provided by Valve themselves. The app could also be a crypto miner, capped to use 10% CPU to avoid suspicion… now I’m searching the internet why steam is constantly using 10% of my CPU…

        I don’t actually know if flathub does checks or anything so this isn’t a jab at them specifically. I personally distrust all package distribution platforms by default and don’t use sandboxed packages on any of my installs.

        I guess we all have to define where the lines are and how far we’re prepared to go. Technically, you should read the actual source code fetched from AUR and only build once you’ve confirmed it does what you expect it to… for every thing you install and for every update. Maybe thats good for Richard Stallman, but the general populace will look for trust outside of only trusting themselves.