• mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Have you seriously never heard of the Nintendo v Palworld cases? Those are still going on after 2 years despite Nintendo’s claims being complete bullshit

    • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Court case with undeniable and sufficient evidence also doesnt last long. There is more to the story than “they do it/they dont do it”

      But claiming they do before it has been proven is dumb.

      • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Defending a company with multiple unrelated entities suing them over the same thing, including non competitors, before they’ve been proven to NOT be doing that thing is very stupid.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          with multiple unrelated entities suing them

          How do we know they’re really unrelated? A lot of the lawsuits are in the US, where bribery lobbying is very prevalent, and the lawsuits brought forth by private entities could be backed by Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo, Epic, etc. under the table. Hell, any publisher/developer involved in the ESA is by definition not “unrelated”.

          Until these lawsuits are fully resolved, nothing has been proven. All we have are claims and speculation at the moment.