Honestly, we should probably just have a state owned and ran chip fab company. If the US is serious about security and/or innovation, that’s what needs to happen. There’s no way it’s going to happen though sadly, but that’s what should be done. >
Why state owned, when they can have privately owned and just funnel your tax money right into it, then retire to take up cushy “consultancy” positions on the board?
Honestly, we should probably just have a state owned and ran chip fab company. If the US is serious about security and/or innovation, that’s what needs to happen. There’s no way it’s going to happen though sadly, but that’s what should be done. >
Why state owned, when they can have privately owned and just funnel your tax money right into it, then retire to take up cushy “consultancy” positions on the board?