• Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    On Ethereum using less: this is due to a different consensus mechanism involved, one that is more eco-friendly, but less distributed and inherently (mathematically) less secure.

    Generally, it should be fine on the scale of Ethereum, but Bitcoin has it safer, at the cost of plenty of power and e-waste.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        That same 51% attack can occur on Proof-of-Stake, except you could immediately rewrite anything and also rob legitimate nodes of their stake, for all I understand.

        Momentary 51% of Proof-of-Work merely makes it possible to extremely slowly rewrite the neighboring blocks. As most Bitcoin transactions require many “confirmations” (blocks coming after the one with the transaction), the attack realistically needs a very big scale (ideally significantly more than 51%, it’s just theoretical minimum), rely on serious level of luck and, through the open ledger, it will be extremely easy to detect.