• plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Technological progress.

    Need sun for solar, so won’t work well for space when you get further out, and no wind in space.

      • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Can it be used to power a turbine? Or just propulsion like a sail, because what if we want to go towards the sun…?

        It also has diminishing returns in relation to distance to the sun.

          • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            In space…? Because that requires moving one part while the others stationary…. The friction from generating power would spin the rest of the satellite, or would need to expend power to resist it.

            Windmills have used sails as fins for long time lol, its nothing new, im trying to get you think critically here.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 hours ago

              In space…? Because that requires moving one part while the others stationary….

              Or moving one part opposite the direction of another, to create resistance.

              Windmills have used sails as fins for long time lol, its nothing new, im trying to get you think critically here.

              There’s plenty of conversation to be had about efficiency, heat venting, gross productivity. But “you can’t capture energy from another moving body” is something billards disproved several centuries ago.