• Ooops@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        5 小时前

        Is it even apt-get still? thought they changed over to apt long ago and apt-get is just a symlink for legacy reasons.

        At least that’s what I last read… (speaking as someone also loving candy) .

          • MsFlammkuchen@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            5 小时前

            apt is meant more for user interaction and apt-get is more stable and more for scripting. But apt-get is often used in online tutorials because it doesn’t really change.

            • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              4 小时前

              I think it wasn’t for APT but I once worked for a business with a lot of RHEL, the script that was updating hundreds of servers was using the user wrapper instead of the binaries. A warning was displayed in the script to warn not to use the wrapper for scripts.

              I warned my team leader of the issue and was completely ignored and was said that it was an issue for the team that made the script in the first place.

              I gave up.

              A few weeks later, the poorly designed script botched a major update on hundred of servers because the wrapper had a tiny change and the update script didn’t handle it well.

              It’s insane to me how much money a business can waste for stupid shit like that. The devs warned us not to use their wrapper to script on, the linux team did it anyway, my warning was ignored, many hours of engineers work was wasted fixing the chaos that ensued.