• Zorcron@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      2 days ago

      No? I think it still looks fine. I think Pixar did pretty well in choosing what types of things they could get away with animating at the time with their early movies.

      • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        still looks decent, yeah, but modern animations just look way different. there’s something a little bit off about that maybe, though I can’t tell from a still image. that image might just be uniquely bad, i remember the movie being way more beautiful overall.

        • sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          The contrast and how vivid it is look off from what I remember. Hardware for rendering has improved a lot since it came out. Maybe the animation masked the “simplicity” for lack of a better term.

    • vogi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      the unterwater parts arent even the worst, wait till you see the human renders again. they scared me for life even back then.

      spoiler