• hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    17 hours ago

    how do we create a system for digital payments without introducing centralized control (and therefore censorship)?

    watches as lemmy tries their best to say anything except crypto

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah, because crypto is not that. The problems with it as a payment system are numerous and make it unusable. It’s barely better than lugging suitcases full of twenties as a payment system for doing crimes, but only barely. The only thing it’s really good for is scamming people and gambling

      • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        What problems? And crypto gets associated with crime because the currency is harder to control, which is precisely the point. Governments love being able to control their payments systems, just like they love to define what a “crime” is.

      • AmanitaCaesarea@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        There are enough crypto currencies made specifically with payment processing as their primary goal. But sure let’s just ignore good tech cus “crypto bros bad”

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        7 hours ago

        BS, Monero is the best currency for making untraceable payments full stop. People buy drugs with it but buying drugs shouldn’t be a crime. We need private currency’s that governments don’t control like that. It may not be great in every way but it’s the beat that exists and is certainly used for more than gambling and scamming people.

        • FatherPeanut@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          I was gonna say, you can tell who’s just a cryptobro vs who actually cares about fiscal freedom based on that. If anyone suggests you use bitcoin, they probablyyyyy aren’t someone to listen to. Zcash and Monero are the only two I’d ever trust as of now.

          Honestly, its a massive shame that a technology as good as crypto was completely usurped by groups just looking to profit. They chant “This is true freedom of finance!” while only caring how much USD it’s worth. Like dawg, that’s why nobody takes crypto seriously.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Dunno why zcash has taken off so much, I believe it’s not private by default, but you have to manually enable that feature.

            Monero is 100% opaque always

            • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              to add why that is bad: it makes those who enable privacy to stand out. those users who do thatbwill face arbitrary restrictions, but also it is easier to doxx the person behind a transaction if there are not a lot of other transactions with privacy enabled

    • Johanno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      In Europe we now slowly get wero.

      This will replace hopefully PayPal, visa and mastercard

      • Noja@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        36 minutes ago

        EU has already stated that it will force companies to use their ID verification system for 18+ content or they will be debanked.

      • RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        As someone who has lives in the Netherlands, were iDeal (the less international predecessor of wero) has been available for years - yes it replaces it, so much.

        And it feels easier and safer at the same time, when my banking app on the phone can just scan the QR code on the website and deal with that.

        Every time I DO use paypal now, usually a foreign webshop, I get a little nervous if my account still works, because it’s been a year or so again.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        it will not replace visa and mastercard if they won’t give a card, but only an app that refuses to work on your phone but also has access to way too many things on it

        • Johanno@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I admit currently WERO has issues and it should not be baked into each banking app.

          But still it will be better than to rely on the grace of American companies

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            But still it will be better than to rely on the grace of American companies

            but that’s still the end result if they are forcing apple or googlified android phones

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      16 hours ago

      We could lobby our governments to regulate the payment processors. Their job is to facilitate transactions, not dictate what they are. Governments could easily regulate them such that they may not do that.

      • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Governments are centralized control. Just take a look at the current US administration, and the economic sanctions they pushed left and right. You trust them to keep their hands off transactions happening within their own country?

      • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        This is so naive it hurts, though. As if there weren’t literally thousands of years’ worth of tales of corruption and failed regulation to learn from.

        I, too, desperately want to believe that democracy can still work despite capitalists having captured it. But I dunno…

        • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Nobody has yet solved the “who watches the watchers?” problem. Because of that, I believe every system of government is doomed to fall to corruption and capture given time.

          I know that there are a lot of mechanisms that can be put in place to mitigate that problem, such as adversarial branches and divisions of authority, but I haven’t seen one yet that does anything more than prolong things and delay what seems to be the inevitable. Until something big changes, the pendulum seems destined to keep swinging back and forth.

          In the meantime, I haven’t seen any way to prevent companies from unethically exerting their will over the public that works any better than involving multiple parties in it that are not necessarily aligned and do your best to prevent collusion, like making the government a party to the transaction by way of regulating the process, though that’s admittedly far from fool-proof, either.

          I’m just trying to lay out the available options at our disposal now as I understand them.

          • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            As I see it, the development of anti-capture systems aren’t about actually preventing capture. Rather, they are to delay the inevitable and to make it so that when a “reset” happens, the good parts of a civilization aren’t too damaged when replacement happens.

            Ideally, the next civilization(s) to arise from the ashes should inherit the best bits of whatever came before.

          • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            In the meantime, I haven’t seen any way to prevent companies from unethically exerting their will over the public that works any better than involving multiple parties in it that are not necessarily aligned and do your best to prevent collusion

            This is just decentralization. This is literally what I alluded to in my root comment. Crypto solves these problems

            • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              That’s just centralization with extra steps. Crypto is easily manipulated by whales and frequently is. At least with governments, I know the names and faces of the people robbing me.

              • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                manipulated by whales? are you talking about 51% attacks? censorship? Can you link some concrete examples of major crypto coins getting manipulated? I think there was a potential 51% attack on Monero but IIRC nothing actually happened.