• BillyClark@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Its object was to solve the problem of evil, that is, to reconcile the existence of evil and suffering in the world with the existence of a perfectly goodall-powerfuland all-knowing God, who would seem required to prevent it

      I’m reminded of HAL from 2001 for some reason. Maybe because HAL was given two conflicting goals and went insane trying to reconcile them with each other, rather than simply discarding the goal that was obviously just some nonsense.

    • too_high_for_this@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Beings are possible together, in turn, when they do not enter into contradiction with each other. For instance, it is logically possible that a meteor might have fallen from the sky onto Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales’s head soon after he was born, killing him. But it is not logically possible that what happens in a given world (e.g. that Jimmy Wales founded Wikipedia) also does not happen in the same world (i.e. that Jimmy Wales did not found Wikipedia).

      • DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        How great it would be to realize that our god is the equivalent of a grade school child making finger painting and crayon drawing versions of worlds in the timeout chair and this was just the one we got stuck with.

      • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I go with Schopenhauer:

        Arthur Schopenhauer argued, contrary to Leibniz, that our world must be the worst of all possible worlds, because if it were only a little worse, it could not continue to exist.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Is that Leibniz?

        Such a fancy boy

        Edit: didn’t click the link before posting. Dunno if I should be impressed or concerned that I recognized this dude lol.

        He might look like a dandy, and might have been way too weirdly Christian, but the man was a fucking genius. Still think his notation style for calculus was better than Newton’s

      • Sergio@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Wai? Dude looks like he plays drums in a Spinal Tap tribute band. What could be better than that?