• Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    5 hours ago

    A condition with a prevalence rate of 0.8% is not worth thinking about, let alone considering in the context of a meme.

    • Caesium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I mean, it’s a pretty hard thing to understand if you don’t know about aphantasia. Since we can’t know what other people experience in their mind, what we perceive is considered ‘normal’ because that’s all we know.

      I didn’t realize I had aphantasia until I was 18. Doesn’t mean I suddenly became aphantasic at that same time.

      • drone678@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I was 48 when I discovered that I had Aphantasia. I was blown away that when I learned that people could imagine pictures in their mind’s eye.

        • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Same here. I think it was actually this meme that did it. I saw people commenting that they could not and I’m like “ha yeah, of course you can’t, who can do that?”. The lots of people are like, yeah, I can create a complex 3d shape in my mind and manipulate it, turn it, get closer, etc. I’m like WTF who are these megamind savants who can do this. Turns out, most people.

          I felt very alone and very incapable after that realization.

      • count_duckula@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I am curious about this condition. What goes on in your head and how did you figure out you had aphantasia? Now I am trying to imagine a rotating cow after reading the comments (didn’t imagine it when I saw the meme), and I can only recreate in my head the gif somebody posted in one of the comments.

    • InputZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      While a prevalence of 0.8% may seem like a tiny amount but when applied to a large population it’s a significant number of people. Let’s say a city has a nice round 100,000 people, a small city by any measure. That’s 800 people, not such a small number anymore. The lives of those 800 people are worth thinking about. Granted in the context of a larger population but it’s still something.