• gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    you are an economist. eliminating zoning laws and HOAs would make construction of houses cheaper, saving lots of people lots of money, but the construction companies would be less profitable. do you argue in favor of unnecessarily complex building codes sothat the company stays profitable at the expense of the population?

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        what if it’s the population who wants you to use the zoning laws and HOAs to restrict the supply so the value of their investment in their home doubles every 10-15 years?

        and the developers have nothing to do with it. because waht they do is just build luxury housing now becaues it has a higher margin than non-luxury units, and you can only build a handful of homes each year in this town thanks to the zoning laws.

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Gotta add on another level.

      Zoning laws and HOA’s give larger construction companies a significant competitive advantage over smaller companies. This limits competition and drives up the cost while also degrading the average quality of the construction as the larger companies seek to maximize profits.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve never seen an economist argue is favor of non-safety related building codes. Ever.

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          If you can hold the mandatory economist’s compulsion to be liberal for long enough to write a coherent argument for that intervention, I’m willing to count it and update my opinion.