The reason the FCC is only allowing the sale of state approved routers in the US?

  • fleck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’s using CSI though. The article said the researches specifically did not utilize CSI.

    But regarding CSI: I evaluated that as a small part of my Master’s thesis and it worked pretty OK for motion detection but not for classifying other activities, at least not on a SISO link. For more complex stuff you would need both a MIMO access point (router) and device (e.g. phone). Also, you need to constantly transmit messages to get up-to-date CSI, which is not great for power consumption as well as cluttering the communication channel. There are some other constraints, especially regarding noise. E.g. I managed to completely destroy the CSI spectrogram by turning on a microwave oven. There is 802.11bf in development, which is supposed to standardize this, because currently using CSI is pretty much a “hack”, as it is not intended for sensing. Once this is widely adopted, I would start being worried, but not right now.

    This is from my thesis: