The reason the FCC is only allowing the sale of state approved routers in the US?

  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 hours ago

    How do they identify a particular person though? I get you could see people as present or not or moving around the room, but it’s insane that they would be able to tell facial features etc.

    • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 minutes ago

      You can initiate identification post visual contact or before loss of visual contact. As long as tracking is good the identification info can be propagated

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The wavelength of a 5 Ghz wifi signal (the highest frequency in common use for wifi) is a little under 6 cm. So as a crude measure, it’s not going to resolve spatial features much smaller than that with much reliability.

    • rnkn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think as a person moves about the waves would get a clearer picture.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      A paper from around a decade ago talked about using WiFi to identify key strokes so with large data models we have today I would assume they could get pretty good fidelity on a person. Maybe not enough for “beyond a reasonable doubt” but probably enough where your WiFi company is selling your data on what you do at home