• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Before you can punish for using LLMs, you need to be able to reliably detect the use of LLMs, including guarding against false positives.

    You can tell they’re using an LLM if they have a computer out during the pen-and-paper test.

    • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Not US, but there’s a tendency of focusing more on the work during the semester than in the exam itself

      LLMs are going to be a massive headache for me when they get older

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 hours ago

      How is that allowed?

      Hell, back in my day, teachers were even very picky about what kind of calculator you could use. And if it was a graphing calculator, you had to show them yourself wiping the memory at the beginning of the test.

      (Except for one algerbra teacher, who was really cool about it. He’d allow custom programs to stay on the calculator if you programmed it yourself. On the theory that if you can write a computer program that reliably solves these math problems, then you must have a very good understanding of how to solve these math problems. And, yes, I was one of the few kids who actually did that. Ah, writing my own custom software for the TI-83 on the TI-83, because that seemed easier than actually doing the math problems by hand … good times.)