• HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Its such a good thing to see a pretty normal part of the human experience get ripped out of every place humans gather because it makes the money holders uncomfortable.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Probably a bit of both. Usually it’s the payment processors being lobbied by vocal “Christian” groups.

    • zewm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If you never know the motivation for something a company does, just know that the answer is always money.

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It sounds like it’s just insertable toys, so it might be a liability thing if they’re afraid people are selling unsafe toys? Who knows. That’s a really weird distinction and definitely one that payment processors don’t make.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Does Kickstarter have liability in general for Kickstarted projects? I’d kind of assume that that’s on the specific project. I can’t imagine that Kickstarter is in any kind of position to really do a domain-specific evaluation of whether a given project is in line with local regulations.

        • JayGray91🐉🍕@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          IIRC, no, they don’t. They put the onus of proving the project is legit on the project maker and on the backers to be vigilant not falling for too good to be true projects.

          Over the years kickstarter has become just another big marketing platform for big brands (for their niche) and pushing out smaller projects.

          As a former serial backer, over the years I “only” have backed 40 or so (I don’t remember the exact number and don’t want to check now) and only 2 that failed to deliver. One, in hindsight, is blatantly a scam and kickstarter didn’t do anything about it. The other one that didn’t deliver is just mismanagement. At least it looked like it. Could still be a scam.

        • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I really have no idea, and this would probably be jurisdiction dependent anyway.

          They do allow things like food, which it seems would come with more liability anyway, if they can be held liable for kickstarted things.

      • zewm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Why would Kickstarter be liable for someone else project.

        That’s like trying to sue UberEats for delivering food that gave you food poisoning.

        • dariusj18@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          You can’t really legalese yourself out of being liable if it can be shown you knew of an issue and did nothing to prevent it.

  • Swuden@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I was thinking about this the other day. Are the powers that be worried about innovation in adult content getting so good that people will stop seeking out real companionship? In their minds it could lead to a drop in births, leading to a drop in consumers and producers.

    • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The only people that would consider porn/etc as a replacement for real sexual intimacy are people who’ve never experienced it.

    • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That is generally the impetus behind religious institutions disdain for it. Their best chance to increase their numbers is through indoctrination of the children of their current members. Conversions rarely occur, despite how much they are talked up when they do.

      They are, of course, wrong to think that. Toys, in practice, generally increase intimacy and likelihood of a couple having children. But not as much as being raised your entire life being told that it is the entire purpose of life and if you don’t have as many kids as you theoretically could, you have done yourself a disservice. So as long as they conflate the results, they will keep assuming they are correct in doing both.

      • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        IMO it’s more about control. I went to Christian private school. Students dating was forbidden.

        They keep children sheltered before pushing them into a marriage/parenthood that is sustained by their participation in the church community. Tho this doesn’t seem to work as well these days as I know of several marriages that ended within 1 year.

        From there it’s a simple matter of peer pressure to keep people in line. I’ve seen parents disown their children to protect their reputation at church.

        It’s a fucking cult.

  • binux@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    They probably think the US prohibition didn’t work because they just didn’t try hard enough

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Prohibition worked. It had the annoying unintended consequence is some people ignored it and became criminals, but alcohol consumption clearly dropped when it was in effect.

      • binux@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 hours ago

        And yet the illegal alcohol market boomed and it gave massive rise to organized crime and government corruption to allow it. It doesn’t “work” in any practical sense, it just concentrates the problem and makes it even harder to control.

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It only didn’t work if you demand absolute perfection, which is unreasonable. I’m going to stand by it worked.

          I already addressed the unintended consequences.

    • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah but how tf do you buy things with monero? 😭

      I spent an afternoon trying to work it out once, and it’s not exactly intuitive, and it seems like the people who convert from normal money into crypto still hold all the strings :/