In fact, the USSR itself used it a lot, typically deflecting any criticism from the US with “but you hang negroes” back when that particular atrocity was a frequent occurrence.
If you look at the same source that you’ve provided, you will also see that using the label “whataboutism” is in itself a fallacy and propaganda strategy.
So… irrelevant… your fallacious propaganda strategy is rejected.
It’s a well- known fallacy and propaganda strategy.
In fact, the USSR itself used it a lot, typically deflecting any criticism from the US with “but you hang negroes” back when that particular atrocity was a frequent occurrence.
If you look at the same source that you’ve provided, you will also see that using the label “whataboutism” is in itself a fallacy and propaganda strategy.
So… irrelevant… your fallacious propaganda strategy is rejected.
That has been CLAIMED by people defending their own use of whataboutism, sure, but they’re wrong.
They’re literally claiming that it’s a tu quoque (appeal to hypocrisy) fallacy to point out this particular tu quoque fallacy 🙄
Right back at you.