• 5too@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    As I recall the story, the tempter was only ever identified as the Serpent. They were even cursed to always go on their belly afterwards, which I don’t recall Satan doing.

    Depending on your mythology, Satan might have instigated that; but I don’t think it was ever established in the story

      • 5too@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        32 minutes ago

        Yeah, I see a lot of people claiming that - but does the Bible make that claim?

        Here’s how the serpent was cursed:

        Because you have done this, You are cursed more than all cattle, And more than every beast of the field; On your belly you shall go, And you shall eat dust All the days of your life. 15 And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed; He shall bruise your head, And you shall bruise His heel.

        I don’t see Satan going on his belly, bruising our heels, or getting his head bruised! How did he escape a curse placed by God? Or is this just the snake’s origin story too? I’m not going to claim the serpent might not have been put up to it, but I don’t see Satan himself making an appearance here.

      • thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        That’s a common interpretation but it’s not actually confirmed anywhere in the bible that the serpent was Satan

        • HoopyFrood@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 minutes ago

          The types of christians who would dig this repressive mobile network are the kind who prefer overly simplified and easily digestible theology; that is to say the people who would pitch and want this phone definitely are in the “serpent is satan” camp not, “lets have a nuanced discussion about metaphors”. Not that they would accept the rebuttal, but i don’t think it’s invalid from the frameworks that produce this nonsense