• unlawfulbooger@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    rsync.net offers ZFS send/receive and I’ve been using it for 5 years now, it’s pretty great. It’s not super expensive per GB, but they ask a minimum of 5TB if you want native ZFS support, which is $60/month.

    You get access to a full FreeBSD VM which is very nice, because you can do things like metrics or a “pull” setup that pulls backups from your machines, so you’re more resilient against stuff like ransomware.

      • unlawfulbooger@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yes it’s not the cheapest option, but I think it’s the only one if you need zfs send/receive. But if you don’t need it you can get less than 5TB for cheaper, or just go elsewhere.

        • Anivia@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I have a 190TB NAS, and Backblaze is $99 for unlimited. At least it was until now

          • xthexder@l.sw0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Backblaze is definitely losing money on you every year, so good luck finding an alternative. I pay $100+/month just in power and network costs to have my own hardware colocated in a real data center, and that’s saving me money compared to renting 200TB anywhere else.

            • Anivia@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Oh, I definitely know I’m not a profitable customer for them. My home electricity bill for my NAS is already a multiple of my Backblaze subscription