• timestatic@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    But the point is you wouldn’t tattoo your child before he is of age and without consulting him. This practice is not necessary

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      you wouldn’t tattoo your child before he is of age

      I would not wait for my son to turn eighteen if he needed a medical alert tattoos to avoid an EMT accidentally killing him.

      Maybe you would. That’s your call as a parent.

      • timestatic@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        What the hell? Why are you suggesting I would let my child die if they needed medical treatment. You might have your own opinions about circumcision but lets keep discussion civil. I’m just saying that most circumcisions done right after birth aren’t done out of medical necessity and I would alter the body of my child because they wouldn’t be able to reverse it if they ever wanted to