• sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Gotta be. Camera cuts are 8 seconds or less. Which isn’t a universal limit anymore but indicates a cheaper model or plan.

      Also things move wierd. Like the stabbing motion with the gun. Or the squid sitting in strange positions instead of “attaching” to the head like you assume it would. In a wierd way I feel like I can almost recognize what films this may have been trained on.

      Also over the last month there has been a deluge of ai videos being made from this perspective on this topic. Context is usually biggest evidence, barring everything else.

      • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Continuity is a film production role that gets taken for granted until its done poorly. I would say that ai isn’t very good at it, but this vid at least looks very consistent with the designs between the shots

    • FuyuhikoDate@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I think that was too damn good for ai slop. But i understand your concern and I am also interested in the source

    • MrQuallzin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The shots are way too consistent to be AI. If it was AI, we’d expect background details to change between each one. This feels like a high quality robot chicken production