• bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Putting this in fixed-width for scale:

    This ruling:                        375,000,000
    Meta valuation:               1,618,000,000,000
    

    This isn’t even a slap on the wrist; it’s a fucking rounding error.

    • 7101334@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Phrased in another way, it’s equivalent to if you had $1,618 in the bank and were fined $0.30.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Super small compared to their income, but a GREAT reason to make all the users age validate.

      • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 minutes ago

        Nah, this is a practice in America. John Oliver did an episode on it but I can’t remember for the life of me what the main topic was.

      • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Fining companies that commit a crime a small portion of the money they gained by committing that crime is not progress, that is the problem here. Meta still made more money, after the fine, than if they had not perpetrated the crime. This is more of the status quo, which is why people are complaining about this the same as they had about the previous million times this same thing happened.