staircase@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-222 hours agoMeta found liable in child exploitation casewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square109fedilinkarrow-up1961arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1954arrow-down1external-linkMeta found liable in child exploitation casewww.theguardian.comstaircase@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-222 hours agomessage-square109fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBarneyPiccolo@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 hours agoSo the fine was basically paid by Lunchtime on January 1.
minus-squareBoiglenoight@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 hours agoYes. It’s probably concerning if they are continuously fined, but unless there’s a mechanism that ensures that, this is likely just annoying and not meaningful.
minus-squareBarneyPiccolo@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoJust an itch to be scratched. Done. What’s for lunch?
So the fine was basically paid by Lunchtime on January 1.
Yes. It’s probably concerning if they are continuously fined, but unless there’s a mechanism that ensures that, this is likely just annoying and not meaningful.
Just an itch to be scratched. Done. What’s for lunch?