return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoCyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer company leaves drivers stranded across the UStechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square103fedilinkarrow-up1425arrow-down15
arrow-up1420arrow-down1external-linkCyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer company leaves drivers stranded across the UStechcrunch.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square103fedilink
minus-squareRekorse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·16 hours agoInterlock devices are the bare minimum if you insist on allowing people who have proven they will drive drunk to continue to drive.
minus-squareplz1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·16 hours agoI was arguing with the point of “repeatedly” being a determining factor for having to have this device. It’s not reality, once is enough.
minus-squarehardcoreufo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 hours agoYes, once is enough. Repeatedly should get you banned from driving.
minus-squareRekorse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·14 hours agoWhen you consider that most people get away with a crime dozens of times at least before getting caught, then yes being caught once is enough.
Interlock devices are the bare minimum if you insist on allowing people who have proven they will drive drunk to continue to drive.
I was arguing with the point of “repeatedly” being a determining factor for having to have this device. It’s not reality, once is enough.
Yes, once is enough. Repeatedly should get you banned from driving.
When you consider that most people get away with a crime dozens of times at least before getting caught, then yes being caught once is enough.