• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Well, that runs into a different problem with the same results.

    Sure, GOOGLE can’t hinder you from installing apps, but the fact that nobody has heard of these OS’s before means your selection of available apps is what hinders your ability to install apps.

    • Arcadeep@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      e/os and Sailfish are pretty popular alternative OSs (OSes? OSii?) and e/os is an android fork, with Sailfish having an android compatibility layer, so they work with standard Android apps.

      Source: I use e/os.

      Why are you in here arguing losing points with no reason or even knowledge about them?

    • illi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      /e/ OS is just a degoogled Android (similar to Graphene, but not so security oriented). You can install the same apps - though some might not work properly.

      Sailfish OS is Linux, but if I understand it correctly they have a compatibility layer enabling you to seamlessly install Android apps on it.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      /e/os is Android without Google proprietary stuff. It runs most Android apps.

      • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        While technically correct, it runs apps, it’s misleading because it won’t run the majority of apps from the playstore.

        Google holds people captive with the playstore and the very sneaky google play services.

        Only the most hardcore tinkerers and privacy oriented would run a pure AOSP phone.

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’ve tried it, and only ran into a couple apps that wouldn’t work with MicroG. I won’t pretend it’s painless, but it’s workable for someone with sufficient motivation.

        • Teknikal@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          These devices have replaced play services with things like micro g, so yes they will run pretty much any android app even Google ones would work but that would be defeating the purpose.

    • somethingDotExe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      “Nobody has Heard of these os’” - wtf you talk about? They are gaining popularity here in EU as well as in Turkey. It’s getting popular to de-google/de-americanize. People are hating on the monopoly iOS and Android has on the industry. Better to do something than being a sheep about it, and just let thos mofos suck the data out of your life forever?

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        That exact issue killed Blackberry, the largest smartphone maker at the time. Even after they built a compatibility layer to run Android apps.

        You think anywhere near enough people are going to go out of their way to try something that doesn’t have marketshare already to maintain an entire alternative hardware and software ecosystem? Where can I get wherever awesome shit you’re smoking?

        • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          When i was a kid, blackberries were more common than android. At least in my area it was the “in” thing to be on BBM