eh, if it pays you usually would. You would be responsible for presenting a finished artistic product, while maybe not your vision it would be within the scope I’d say.
wheras here it’s… just slapped on afterwards by an algorithm that changes, will change and neither you nor shareholders can control how it looks.
The artists don’t really have to make it an option if they don’t want to.
isnt this a shareholder decision? i.e. not the artists choice? 😅
but yes, and hopefully most people will turn off this stuff for looking ugly 🤷 but probaby mostly cus they cant afford it
If you’re working under shareholders who don’t respect your artistic integrity, you’re not getting any artistic freedom anyway.
eh, if it pays you usually would. You would be responsible for presenting a finished artistic product, while maybe not your vision it would be within the scope I’d say.
wheras here it’s… just slapped on afterwards by an algorithm that changes, will change and neither you nor shareholders can control how it looks.