Yep. Imagine that, using the specialist version of the OS strips out a lot of the bullshit.
I’ll never argue that the suck inherent to Windows is OK, but anyone who thinks it’s somehow completely unavoidable just isn’t trying. It’s always kind of shocking to see Linux users, who are at least on paper tech savvy, have complaints that include shit that can be disabled by toggling a single switch in a top level settings menu. Meanwhile they’ll act like some of the arcane hoops needed to fix shit like sleep mode, hdr, or audio on some combinations of hardware and distro is just par for the course.
Personally, I find the better approach to convert folks isn’t to create an insane caricature of the issues with Windows, but to go “here’s the list of all the stuff you need to do to fix Windows, or you can sidestep it entirely with Linux but risk occasional strange hardware compatibility problems”
I have literally never seen this occur outside of:
it attempting to reset the default PDF viewer multiple times
twice when the entire group of settings related to cortana/internet search from the taskbar changed and they didn’t attempt to map previous choices to the new settings
That was over the course of a literal decade, most of it with a day job working IT and sysadmin in a Windows environment.
If you’ve got more hard evidence of MS doing this I’d love to see it, but as far as I can tell this comes from the same place that has resulted in every support thread saying you need to run “SFC /scannow”.
My PC used to turn itself on occasionally after I put it to sleep at night and went to bed. Over a span of weeks, I’d track down the latest reason for starting up and disable it until it would only wake on keyboard or by hitting the power button.
Except I’d have to reapply them because it would just randomly be enabled again.
Yep. Imagine that, using the specialist version of the OS strips out a lot of the bullshit.
I’ll never argue that the suck inherent to Windows is OK, but anyone who thinks it’s somehow completely unavoidable just isn’t trying. It’s always kind of shocking to see Linux users, who are at least on paper tech savvy, have complaints that include shit that can be disabled by toggling a single switch in a top level settings menu. Meanwhile they’ll act like some of the arcane hoops needed to fix shit like sleep mode, hdr, or audio on some combinations of hardware and distro is just par for the course.
Personally, I find the better approach to convert folks isn’t to create an insane caricature of the issues with Windows, but to go “here’s the list of all the stuff you need to do to fix Windows, or you can sidestep it entirely with Linux but risk occasional strange hardware compatibility problems”
These are tools, not religion.
Until windows decides you really should have that switched on and flips it back after an update.
I have literally never seen this occur outside of:
That was over the course of a literal decade, most of it with a day job working IT and sysadmin in a Windows environment.
If you’ve got more hard evidence of MS doing this I’d love to see it, but as far as I can tell this comes from the same place that has resulted in every support thread saying you need to run “SFC /scannow”.
My PC used to turn itself on occasionally after I put it to sleep at night and went to bed. Over a span of weeks, I’d track down the latest reason for starting up and disable it until it would only wake on keyboard or by hitting the power button.
Except I’d have to reapply them because it would just randomly be enabled again.
That was my main issue with Windows. I’m not here to fight with my computer, especially not with a corporation controlling MY computer.