cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/43990476

Your daily reminder that by supporting Big Tech, you are contributing to the insane wealth disparity.

Rather support smaller businesses, where your money helps create actual jobs and grow the working class.

If you haven’t started your journey, please check out: https://purchasewithpurpose.io/

There are so many excellent choices out there that give you a similar or better experience.

  • Aproposnix@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    #EatTheRich

    Billionaires should not exist. They are like nuclear weapons and should be treated as such. Treaties should be made to mitigate their damage.

    • BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Normal people fantasize about winning the lottery and having a few million mostly so that they can stop participating in the rat race, quit their job, have more time for creativity, have more time for family, have more time to be human. The fact that these people blow past that, and continue to want to hoard wealth shows how sick they actually are. If they were hoarding literally anything else nobody would question it. They do not work harder than everyone else.

      • Aproposnix@scribe.disroot.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        To make it even worse, a lot (all?) Of that wealth is not even real. So they’re hoarding imaginary wealth which they use to keep everyone else from having real material security. The whole system is screwed and we just let it happen. Its quite depressing.

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      That would be a great idea. Imagine a group of countries who get together and decide to coordinate economic policies, like NATO but rather than military action, and it focuses on the internal distribution of resources. They could perhaps do a much better job precisely targeting individuals with sanctions, and would perhaps be a much better wielder of the “tariff” in any kind of weaponized fashion.

  • patrick@lemmy.bestiver.se
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Lol, hopefully any Googlers happy with their $500k pay package stop and consider if Sundar is really worth 1,000 of them.

    (Yes I know this is technically a 3-year pay package so it’s closer to ~450x a single $500k pay package)

  • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    15 hours ago

    So what exactly does he do that’s worth $300,000/hr? Or let’s say he works 10 hours a day, 7 days a week for the whole year (and you know he does not), $190,000/hr?

    • Eximius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      He comes from a long line of nobility and these tech lands were promised to him as a dowry

  • IllNess@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Google got rid of thousands of employees in the last 5 years and this asshole gets half a billion dollars…

  • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I propose there is a final step in Cory Doctorow’s enshittification theory, which is one step past the company collecting rents from captured business and customer bases: the CEO leading the enshittification push collecting exorbitant rewards for facilitating the process.

    • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      18 hours ago

      That’s been proposed before. The next step was where they’ve lock in shareholders and investors and milk them dry, apparently with ridiculously large pay packages.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Wondering what’s fueling the AI bubble? Spoiler: it’s not company profits. It’s this.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    My problem is how do I get people to stop using google.

    I can open a business, but if I’m not on the monopoly search app, nobody will know.

    I don’t use google anymore, but everyone else does, and no, they won’t migrate off gmail and Apple and Google don’t let you change your search provider. Google doesn’t even let you remove Google Search from pixel launcher.

    • baronvonj@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I replaced Pixel launcher with Lawnchair. Very similar UX but let’s you do things like set the search bar to just open your default browser.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yeah I opened a business as well but quickly realized it’s nearly impossible without capitulating to the monoliths that are modern advertising platforms from Meta and Google.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You can change your default search provider on any platform. The problem is no one actually does it, and Google is always the default, because they invest billions of dollars in that arrangement.

  • definitely_AI@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Be sheer existence in a capitalist society, we a contributing to an insane wealth disparity, wars all over the world, the breakdown of democracy and law and order, and the total destruction of our biotope.

    • Hapankaali@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Have you noticed how ancient religious texts like the Bible often heavily focus on financial themes, especially debt and inequality? This was long before capitalism existed. The existence of markets (capitalist or not) tends to lead to inequality. In fact, modern capitalist societies were the first to have the ability (though not necessarily the will…) to adequately address this issue using progressive taxation, as opposed to the older methods like the Jubilee, bans on usury, and later feudalism (all of which have severe drawbacks).