• zeezee@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    bro wat - I’m yet to see a socialist party group turn up to an anti-fash protest and put themselves in harms way to protect vulnerable groups instead of standing on the side lines selling political newspapers and dipping out as soon as their leaders decide they’d like to go home

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      There are plenty of Socialist revolutions but they happen outside of the first world. Coincidentally anticolonial movements are often opposed by Anarchist because the victims aren’t perfect enough.

      on the side lines selling political newspapers

      Anarchist 'zines are literally a meme term

      • zeezee@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        yeah that’s fair - but I feel they serve different purposes?

        like I see anarchism as a form of counterbalance to state power irrespective of where it is - without needing to be dogmatic

        as in undeniably Uruguay is materially much better now than its ever been (while still being at the peak of it’s colonial project even under socialist governance)

        same with Bolivia giving relative power to indigenous peoples while improving living conditions even under a corrupt government

        neither is perfect but vastly better than western powers seizing their resources and wage enslaving their populations - same goes for other socialist Global South countries

        and yet I see the value of anarchist “purity” criticism in that it should continue to challenge all governments when the time is right - even socialist ones - as at the end of the day we all want a stateless society - and until then I dont see why anarchism and socialism can’t strive to achieve that through productive structural tension?

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Anarchists are a lot better than Liberals. But when push comes to shove, such as Iran getting invaded, many Anarchists are all too happy to hop on the imperialist fence and hold both-sides stories like it’s a moral high-ground

          and yet I see the value of anarchist “purity” criticism

          That sounds fun and all but who is going to fight imperialism then? Are colonized countries going to free themselves because Anarchists blocked a weapons shipment but then the Anarchist opposes the resistance force fighting against the colonists? Fidel Castro sent fighters to support the imperfect ANC. Now that was some actual solidarity. Though we don’t see much of that from “socialist” countries anymore either.

          • zeezee@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            idk what anarchists you’re around but all the ones I hang out with are vocally pro Iran even if they dont approve of the Ayatollah on principle - but yh I’d take mls over liberals any day of the week - I feel part of it is that anarchists aren’t a solid block so while some may block shipments other might fight against what they see as oppression that on a geopolitical scale can result in helping colonial forces - idk we’re all imperfect so I hope we can recognize that and through different means still continue to erode imperialism instead of fighting with each other at the benefit of colonizers