• humanamerican@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I catch myself going on socialist rants at the slightest provocation these days so I’m thinking maybe Scully is wrong here

    • arrow74@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Scully eventually ended up being genuinely wrong most of the time. The show didn’t want to drop her “scientific straightman” role as Mulder’s foil, but damn the evidence became stacked for the paranormal

      • QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        That’s one reason why I’m not a fan of the show, it was in a long list of a lot of 90’s media that portrayed skeptics as “naive” and “unwilling to accept evidence”, and believers as always right, when in reality it’s the other way around.

          • tempest@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            IPAs used to be good.

            Then everyone and their brother started a brewery and every beer became “oops all hops”

            The same thing also happened to sour beers.

      • tomiant@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        The necessity of the sedentary growing of barley and hops for brewing beer is the only thing that is kind of holding me back from reverting to full on mammoth hunter.

        • notabot@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I can’t help but feel that the general lack of mammouths may also put a bit of a crimp on that plan. Sorry to burst your bubble. Maybe you could diversify a little? Maybe start with squirrels and work your way up?

          • tomiant@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Hey look, aim for the stars is what my great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather used to say before he ate all the mammoths.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I don’t get that statement. “I want to believe” kind of implies you don’t believe, but you wanna. You wanna, but you fail, or something.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I think at its roots its like, you have to be willing to consider things first. You have to start with a willingness to believe.

        Or at least thats Mulders MO in the show.

        Scully is the scientist, the hard nosed skeptic.

        If you haven’t watched the show, it actually has aged decently, if its a bit campy.

  • SayJess@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Some of the guys I work with, defend the oligarchs. You see, my coworkers are temporarily inconvenienced millionaires. They explained that the billionaires earned their money (not through the exploitation of millions of people), therefore they should not have their wealth taxed in a fair manner.

    Oh, and also, if you work at McDonalds, you deserve to struggle to make rent. My coworkers had to do it, therefore everyone else should have to do it as well. After all, if you want a better job, just go find a better one? If you don’t have the ability to go back to school, that’s on you. If you are unable to pay rent, you deserve to become homeless. What the hell happened to personal accountability? I’m sorry, I thought this was America.

    I can’t deal with their ignorant, racist, views anymore. Their inability to empathize hurts my soul. Everything is money to them. When I mention that we are talking about people, they say “Well who’s going to pay for that? Not me!”.

  • Mika@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Wealth is an abstract. What is a corporation price? You do one media statement and the price plummets. The “means of production” surely cost some, but if it crumbles and you just sell whatever you can, it would be a tiny fracture of what “the company” was “worth” before.

    The most wealthiest people don’t just sit on cash, they run businesses. One of the reasons why you can’t just eat the rich (even if you have the power), it’s just not effective. You’ll get scraps by killing the whole industries.

    What you can do is tax the “rich” with progressive taxes, where the “rich” is an upper working class, and maybe lower middle class. Its never about the wealthiest.

    Left/Right politics is a clown fiesta. We need some fresh ideas, cause these surely don’t work.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The percentage of sociopaths involved with creating a society should never be greater than zero.

    Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      We had a big war over this like 12000 years ago, and the wrong people won. It’s hard to argue with institutional greed, it spreads like a cancer. Once you start hoard things, shit will just devolve into mine and thine and war and dynastic hierarchies and royal incest and slavery and shit.

      As far as I’m concerned I’d rather be hunting deer on the steppe and deal with the lack of medical care and just take it. Give me something to do, keep myself fit, have some purpose. What the fuck am I talking about? Anyway, we still need someone to make beer though but that can be kept compartmentalized. Like Göbekli! Let’s meet once a year at the tepe and drink and fuck ourselves into oblivion, and just accept the natural progression of life. I’m sure we can find some herb or root or some shit for the headaches.

    • killea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      ‘Financial obesity’ needs to be a term coined and proliferated into our lexicon. Masses gotta understand this shit somehow,

      • jimmux@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        This is the term I’ve been looking for. Too much wealth is a symptom of serious underlying problems.

  • doug@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    19 hours ago

    “Except for your desire to be abducted by aliens. That’s a direct result, probably.”

  • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Going to be that nerd.

    These type of wealth disparities existing before capitalism. In ancient grand societies the wealth was controlled by a small elite almost always and class mobility was non-existent.

    The issue isn’t capitalism, it’s just that the history of our specifies across various society tends to ebb and flow in various directions in response to historical events and contexts. Go read Piketty’s work on this.

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Also, any non-“capitalist” nation that currently exists is likely filled with peasants working subhuman conditions to survive under despots.

    • NotAnonymousAtAal@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      “Bad things existed before, so we should not criticize them still existing today” is not a very strong argument.

        • arnitbier@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Uh huh which is why he simply illustrated the point being made and why its flawed lmao

          He’s responding to a meme criticizing this exact idea. So he’ll likely criticising that criticism and defending its position.

          This is like 5th grade level analysis bro it’s not that complicated

          But hey defend your guy. And the context is that you are defending that idea as well. Because why are you defending this and not every time someone reads into a comment? Likely because you have an issue with what he’s pointing out. Not like automatically but it pretty likely DOES mean that and that matters to people, which is why we concern ourselves with implications of things we say in the modern age, it reveals shit