• jmankman@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Language is about intent.

    I think “Jap” is one of the dumbest slurs there is, since it’s just cutting off two letters from the country, and I’m not offended when I hear it, I just laugh. But it’s still a slur.

    There is an entire South Park episode on people changing the way they use “fag” from slander against gays, to slander against Harley motorcycle riders. You are one of the gays in this episode who doesn’t understand the intent behind why/how the way the word is used changes

    • maniclucky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There was no ambiguous intent to how they used the slur. It was the classic “they’re bad because they’re like X” usage. It’s a word with a long history of harming a marginalized group. It was resurrected by awful people for its original awful purpose.

      So, less good faith this time: why do you defend it? What worth does it have that cannot be claimed elsewhere?

      Asked by someone part of a group that was painted with the r-slur for a long ass time (autism).