• TheRealKuni@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I think the argument is that voting for status quo candidates aren’t actually getting us those things, either. And any small incremental gains are quickly reverted the next time republicans are in power.

    And you can only believe that if you ignore every bit of progress that has stuck around in the last thirty years.

    Progress isn’t a straight line up. Like anything else it dips and wobbles. But it consistently moves upward.

    Yeah there are always going to be things to make progress on. But to pretend that we are not in a better place on some of those issues now than we were thirty years ago is bafflingly silly.

    As an example: In 1996, support for same-sex marriage was so low that congress passed and Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act, allowing states to ignore same-sex marriage licenses from other states in direct violation of the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution, and this was widely supported by the American people. In 2023, over 70% of Americans supported gay marriage while only 22% opposed. That number has dipped since, but not by much. In 2025, it was 68% support (88% of Democrats, 76% of Independents, and 41% of Republicans) while 29% opposed it.

    That is an issue on which the American people have made significant progress. That progress hasn’t evaporated with alternating administrations. It ebbs and flows like literally everything, but over time it has improved.

    Most are like this. Not all! Certainly some things consistently get worse, like wealth inequality. But to act like everything simply flip-flops between parties and that the Democrats are simply a ratchet that maintains the status quo and doesn’t let anything change just to let the next Republican make it worse is flat-out wrong.

    Are Democrats largely spineless corporate shills? Yeah. But are they just as bad as Republicans? Fuck no. Go vote in primaries. Support candidates who will actually push for change. Giving up is pathetic.

    • Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I’m not sure if I completely follow.

      Bill Clinton passed a law defining marriage between a man and a woman. And you are saying this is an example of progress made by a centrist candidate. Isn’t this the law doing the opposite, here?

      And you are saying that Gavin Newsom, who has spoken out against trans rights, can do something similar? Like assuming he does the same thing, like pass a “Defense of gender” bill to allow other states to not recognize gender transitions.

      Are you saying he will bring progress this way?

      • village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        He’s saying that we’ve made progress in the 30 years since then, using that as an example of past public opinion.

        And Newsom is an example of things ebbing, but the line of progress for trans rights has absolutely gone up overall.

    • DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      What do you say to the people of WV who voted for Bernie in the 2016 Democrat primary, won him every single county, and 40k more votes than the runner up, but Clinton won the state? Should they give up, or comitt voter fraud and vote 110%?