• acosmichippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    also don’t need 15 GBps (120gbps) for every day use, so some of that bandwidth can be sacrificed for better range. ultra high speed hdmi is 48gbps.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Wireless 4k 120hz streaming from my PC to TV would be pretty sweet. I can run a cable if i really wanted… but this would be easier. It’s still more than that, but getting that would be sweet.

    • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah I wonder if they can use the same configuration to improve bandwidth at frequencies that penetrate walls, people and things better

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Unfortunately, looks like the breakthrough is silicon that can credibly work with those frequencies at all with a reasonable power budget, by simplifying and reducing power draw. Maybe it could somehow reduce energy usage of wifi, but they seemed to be all in on being over 100ghz… So the tech won’t be increasing the throughput of anything more practical.